Hydrothermal alteration and lithogeochemistry of the boundary volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit, Central Newfoundland, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Boundary volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposit (0.45 Mt @ 3.4% Cu, 4.0% Zn, 1.0 % Pb, 34 g/t Ag) is located in the Tally Pond group (~510 Ma), central Newfoundland, Canada. The deposit is hosted by rhyolitic rocks that are interpreted to have formed within a rifted continental arc on the leading edge of Ganderia. Mineralization consists of massive pyrite, chalcopyrite, and sphalerite lenses. The basal portion of these lenses contain lapilli tuff clasts indicative of replacement style mineralization. Three hydrothermal alteration assemblages are recognized at Boundary: quartz-sericite, chlorite-sericite, and intense chlorite. Lithogeochemical data are useful in identifying key element associations and alteration assemblages. Short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectroscopy data provide an effective vector for Zn mineralization and correlate with whole rock geochemistry. Lithogeochemical and SWIR data have been used to recreate a three-dimensional alteration model of the Boundary deposit that may be useful in further mineral exploration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".