MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7038641642

Identifying the functional relevance of CD271 and CD133 in medulloblastoma tumor formation

2012· other· en· W7038641642 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2012
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of TorontoManitoba Health Research CouncilHealth Sciences Centre FoundationBrain Tumour Foundation of CanadaHealth Sciences Centre Research FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMedulloblastomaCellNodStem cellFunction (biology)CD24GliomaCD44
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Medulloblastoma (MB) is the most common primary malignant pediatric brain tumor. The relationship between stem cell function and invasiveness has not been investigated in MB. We have dissected MB heterogeneity and compared the capacity for self-renewal and invasion. Our laboratory has identified a combination of 3 cell surface markers that can be used to select for cells with a high self renewal capacity or high invasive capacity. CD271 and CD24 cell surface markers were shown to select for cells that exhibited higher self-renewal capacity whereas CD133 selected for higher invasive capacity. The next step was to confirm these findings in vivo. A mouse model was developed and optimized in the laboratory using NOD SCID mice. Initial data has shown mice injected with higher unsorted cell numbers develop tumor symptoms earlier than mice injected with less cells. Additionally, CD271+/133- cells appear to develop tumors at a faster rate than CD271-/CD133- cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies→French-language works237,207→