MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7038711950

Jean-Pierre MARTIGNONI : Approche de « santé publique » des jeux d’argent : présentation d’un livre collectif sur le jeu problématique et critiques de la doxa du jeu pathologie maladie : Harm Reduction for Gambling : Public health approach to gambling« (Centre du jeu excessif (CHUV/Lausanne) et National Problem Gambling Clinic de Londres 2019, 176 pages) (Réduction des méfaits du jeu : approche de santé publique du jeu ») ( 17 pages, 28 notes), ( publié sur : lescasinos.org 10 /1/2020 ; casino legal France 10 /1/2020 )

2020· other· fr· W7038711950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2020
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoxaContext (archaeology)Identity (music)Subject (documents)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.008
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0080.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)→Same topicMedical, Sociocultural, and Biopolitical Studies→French-language works237,207→