MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038769178

Incidencia de la puesta en marcha del nuevo terrapuerto trujillo en el servicio de transporte interprovincial de pasajeros en la ciudad de trujillo

2017· dissertation· en· W7038769178 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2017
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassenger transportQuarter (Canadian coin)Public transportService (business)PopulationWork (physics)Sample (material)Order (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work was performed in order to determine the impact of the implementation of the new
\nTerrapuerto Trujillo in the service of interprovincial transport of passengers in the city of
\nTrujillo 2015, under which the city of Trujillo, a considerable number transport companies
\nlocated in different parts of the city, which for many years has generated a vehicular congestion,
\npoor service, informal enterprises, lack of hygiene, insecurity, infrastructure, etc. specific
\nobjectives to help us analyze and evaluate the current customer service offered was drawn up
\nTerrapuerto Trujillo, then determine the perception of users regarding the new Terrapuerto
\nTrujillo with a population of 720,000 users in the first quarter and finally design a breeding
\nprogram in interprovincial passenger service.
\n
\nThe methodology used for data analysis consisted in the development of surveys and
\nquestionnaires applied to a sample of 384 users to determine the perception of users and how it
\nhas affected the population.
\n
\nThe results of this research have established that the launch of the new Terrapuerto Trujillo has
\nimpacted positively on the service of interprovincial passenger transport in the city of Trujillo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.568
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicForensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesFrench-language works237,207