MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038780462

La imagen de Europa en los medios de comunicación del mundo hispanófono y lusófono

2023· book· fr· W7038780462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2023
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicTardigrade Biology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)General interestLimiting
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce travail a été publié grâce au soutien financier de l’équipe de recherche ERLIS (EA 4254) de l’Université de Caen Normandie. PILAR (Presse, Imprimés, Lecture dans l’Aire Romane) est une association fondée dans le but de développer la recherche et d’assurer un lien entre les chercheurs dans ce domaine. Elle entend se situer dans la continuité de l’équipe de recherche PILAR 2 (Presse Ibérique et Latino-Américaine de Rennes 2), fondée en 1981 à l’initiative de Jacqueline Covo-Maurice et de Jean-François Botrel par un groupe d’hispanistes de l’Université Rennes 2, dont les travaux ont été publiés par les Presses Universitaires de Rennes 2. / Esta obra ha sido publicada gracias al apoyo financiero del equipo de investigación ERLIS (EA 4254) de la Universidad de Caen. PILAR (Presse, Imprimés, Lecture dans l’Aire Romane) es una asociación creada con objeto de desarrollar la investigación y mantener un vínculo entre los investigadores de esta especialidad. Es asimismo continuación de PILAR 2 (Presse Ibérique et Latino-Américaine de Rennes 2), fundada en 1981 a iniciativa de Jacqueline Covo-Maurice y de Jean-François Botrel por un grupo de hispanistas de la Universidad Rennes 2, cuyos trabajos han sido publicados por las Presses Universitaires de Rennes 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.113

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicTardigrade Biology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207