La Revolución En Blanco, Negro Y Rojo: Arte, Política, Y Obreros En Los Inicios Del Periódico El Machete. (spanish)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay explores the first year of the newspaper El Machete, when it functioned as a vehicle for the politically engaged artists of the Sindicato de Obreros Técnicos, Pintores y Escultores de México. It positions that endeavor at the intersection between politics, social mobilization and culture in Mexico City in the 1920s, particularly in relation to the rise of the CROM labor federation and the critique of official unionism from the left. It addresses the text and images of the newspaper as the products of a particular historical moment, as a collective artistic and ideological project that combined elements of Modernism with popular and radical traditions, and as an important element in the development of graphic representations of the revolution and its iconic social protagonists, workers and campesinos.\nEl ensayo analiza el primer año del periódico El Machete, cuando éste funcionaba como medio de expresión para los artistas politizados del Sindicato de Obreros Técnicos, Pintores y Escultores de México. Posiciona este esfuerzo entre la política, los movimientos sociales y la cultura en la Ciudad de Méxco en la década de 1920, particularmente en relación con el ascenso de la CROM y la crítica de la izquierda del sindicalismo oficial. Considera que tanto texto como imágenes del periódico fueron producto de un momento histórico particular, un proyecto artístico e ideológico colectivo que combinó elementos del Modernismo con tradiciones populares y radicales, y que fueron elemento importante en la evolución de las representaciones gráficas de la revolución y dos de sus íconos sociales centrales: los trabajadores y campesinos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".