The Last Schooners: The Two-Masted Schooner Katie Eccles and the Decline of Sail on Lake Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The last quarter of the 19th century witnessed the increasing industrialization of the Great Lakes region and the emergence of the modern Great Lakes transportation system, a system which would ultimately supplant the sailing commerce which defined freight transport on the lakes throughout most of the 19th century. While steamboats were introduced to the Great Lakes as early as 1817, competition between sail and steam was limited before the middle of the 19th century, with sail and steam occupying separate economic roles in the emerging regional economy. The introduction of novel steam-propulsion technologies and more efficient steamship designs intended for carrying freights from the 1840s and 1850s brought sail and steam into direct competition.\n \nBy the early 1880s, the momentum within shipping on the Great Lakes had decidedly begun to shift toward steamships as increasingly efficient steamships and means of handling bulk freights lowered freight rates and shifted shipping markets towards bulk low-cost, low profit per ton transport, all of which favored steam. By the 1880s, Lake Ontario’s sailing fleets had been largely relegated from the profitable inter-lake trade to local trading confined within Lake Ontario and the Upper St. Lawrence and by 1900 had become almost entirely reliant on the transport of a single commodity, anthracite coal. In this local role, sailing vessels persisted for another 30 years.\n \nIn 2019 the author directed the Last Schooner Project, photogrammetrically documenting and surveying the wreck of the two-masted schooner Katie Eccles which was among the last schooners in operation on Lake Ontario. This survey produced significant information regarding the changes that sailing vessels underwent in their final years, as well as the specialized role such vessels possessed in Lake Ontario’s intra-lake trade in which sailing commerce on the Great Lakes spent its final years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".