La prophétie du Huitième Feux ou le chemin d’une guérison ontologique. Ethnographie d’un stage spirituel de guérison Algonquin-Anicinabe en France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research paper explores how indigenous spiritual practices, particularly those of the Algonquins-Anicinabek people of Canada, are being reappropriated in the contemporary European context, notably through healing ceremonies and spiritual retreats. At the heart of these practices is the prophecy of the Seven Fires, now extended to the Eighth Fire, which calls for global reconciliation and collective spiritual transformation to restore harmony between humans and Mother Earth. Using an anthropological approach, this research analyses the reception of these practices by European participants and questions the idea of possible religious adherence or personal transformation. It also examines the influence of these rituals on the perception of Western modernity and on the revival of indigenous spirituality through the prism of personal development and mystical tourism. The work is based on field observations during a healing course organised in Normandy, as well as on multidisciplinary academic literature, integrating studies of new religiosities, cultural tourism and neo-shamanic movements. The aim of this research is to understand how these spiritual practices, while part of the logic of the market and modern consumerism, can offer alternative ways of relating to the world and contribute to a critique of contemporary Western society.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".