MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038894325

Investigating the Difference Between Members in the High-resolution Rapid Refresh Ensemble (HRRRE) During the February 23rd, 2022 Winter Storm

2023· article· en· W7038894325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecipitationProbabilistic logicQuantitative precipitation forecastProbabilistic forecastingStormRange (aeronautics)Ensemble forecastingEvent (particle physics)Identification (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Probabilistic forecasting is one tool that is being used to help create more accurate and understandable forecasts. Using percentages and probabilities allows for more depth to a forecast and allows forecasters to be able to convey a clearer message of what exactly they are expecting. Ensembles are a set of forecast models that have either different starting conditions, boundary conditions or parameter settings. They are one way of creating probabilistic forecasts and can help in the understanding of the likelihood of a specific outcome. Forecasters use ensembles to attempt to analyze the range of possible outcomes and the likelihood of those outcomes that a weather system can present. However, each weather event is unique in the confidence and agreement between different weather models and their respective ensembles. The High-Resolution Rapid Refresh Ensemble (HRRRE) is an experimental ensemble product with a goal of having real world observations fall within the spread of the ensembles. There is an increased emphasis on the uncertainty of precipitation type (p-type) in mixed precipitation events. This study is to investigate the differences in key variables and p-type between the warmest and coldest HRRRE members. The forecast for both the camps of the ensemble will be compared to ground observations, specifically; 2-meter temperature, precipitation type, precipitation amount, and wind from the; New York State Mesonet, the Automated Surface Observation System, the meteorological Phenomena Identification Near Ground, from the Winter Precipitation Type Research Multi-Scale Experiment (WINTRE-MIX). During the WINTRE-MIX field campaign soundings were also launched at 4 different sites around the St. Lawrence River Valley that helped provide a vertical profile of the storm. The event that is going to be researched occurred from February 22nd-23rd, 2022 in northern New York and Southern Quebec. This event produced widespread icing from Northern New York through the St. Lawrence River Valley. Leading up to the event, differences in 925mb heights and meridional wind were observed between the warm and cold camps. Stronger meridional winds just above the boundary layer led to increased mixing in the warmer members throughout the boundary layer, leading to the surface inversion behind mixed out faster. Research supports the fact that the colder members were closer to reality at the surface within the WINTRE-MIX region due to this difference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York)Same topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207