MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7038914176

La exposición temporal Colección de Antigüedades Ibicencas Sáinz de la Cuesta en el Museo Arqueológico Nacional y la arqueología púnica en los años sesenta del siglo XX

2022· article· es· W7038914176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Order (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El 24 de junio de 1967 se inauguró en el Museo Arqueológico Nacional una exposición sobre la «Colección de Antigüedades Ibicencas Sáinz de la Cuesta». La muestra se organizó en un momento clave para la arqueología fenicio-púnica en España, pues la disciplina se encontraba en pleno auge tras diversos hallazgos arqueológicos sucedidos en el sureste de la península ibérica. En las próximas páginas se pretende analizar el discurso expositivo de dicha exposición con el propósito de conocer cómo se plasmó, en los años sesenta del siglo XX, la presencia púnica en Ibiza a través de su materialidad. Dentro de la exposición tuvo un protagonismo especial un conjunto de terracotas procedentes de los yacimientos de Puig des Molins, Illa Plana, Puig d’en Valls, Talamanca y Es Culleram, muchas de estas piezas conocidas desde principios del siglo xx por los trabajos de la Sociedad Arqueológica Ebusitana. La exposición marcó un punto de inflexión en el estudio de las terracotas púnicas de Ibiza, imprescindibles para conocer el impacto púnico en las denominadas Islas Pitiusas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207