Les coups de l'itinérance: une étude sur la victimisation criminelle du point de vue des itinérants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce rapport de recherche fait état des résultats d’une recherche portant sur la victimisation criminelle des personnes itinérantes à Montréal. À partir d’une analyse thématique de 17 entrevues semi-directives, réalisées auprès d’itinérants fréquentant le centre de jour de l’Accueil Bonneau, différents thèmes sont abordés. Dans un premier temps, il s’agit de décrire les expériences de victimisation vécues par les personnes itinérantes (nature, circonstances, source et conséquences) et de montrer, notamment, le rôle que peuvent jouer les interactions sociales dans les expériences de victimisation. Dans la dernière partie du rapport, nous traitons de la prise en charge des personnes itinérantes victimisées et des interactions qu’entretiennent les personnes itinérantes avec les acteurs susceptibles d’intervenir suite à l’avènement d’une expérience de victimisation (police, ambulanciers, etc.).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".