La medicalización de la infancia como optimización de la fuerza laboral en España. Higienismo, población infantil y biopolítica (1800-1850)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intention of this work is to analyze the recurring dynasties of certain discourses (most of them of medical and legal inspiration, although not only) that began to break into the political scene of our country since the last quarter of the 18th century. Since then, attention to the health status of the population has increased: the high number of infant mortality, the increase in the spread of contagious diseases, the high crime rate, have caused the phenomenon of what was called the "degradation of the population”. In this case, we are going to focus on the analysis of a set of these reform proposals aimed at caring for children, raised by the most liberal pole of the Spanish sociopolitical framework of the time. Applying an archaeogenealogical examination, we intend to show how attention to the "weak population" (women and minors) facilitated the transformation of the old disciplinary model into a new model of biopolitical organization that absolutely colonized the private space of families. With the "profit for anomalies" a discourse on the family economy emerged that was unprecedented until then, which quickly managed to introduce reforms in the civil and criminal codes. Until then, no measures aimed at the child population had been contemplated in these fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".