L'abitato villanoviano di via S. Donato-Caserma Battistini a Bologna
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complex theme of the formation of the proto-urban settlement of Felsina is currently at the centre of the scientific debate. An important role for understanding these dynamics is played by the numerous older villages, located in the area around the future city. In this article we intend to present the village of via S. Donato-Caserma Battistini. \nThe occupation of this area begins in the Final Bronze Age 3, with the construction of numerous elliptical huts. In the Early Iron Age this village was enlarged and its planimetric system was regularized through the construction of perimeter structures such as ditches and timber palisades. The internal area is divided into a housing sector, with many rectangular huts, and a productive area. This village is characterized by different phases, in which it is possible to notice the renovation of some huts and the construction of a gravel road. Around the middle of the 8th century BC, this context began to lose its residential connotation and became a craft area, with the presence of furnaces and large drain holes, which obliterated the perimeter structures and the huts. At the same time, we notice the implantation of some burials of non-eminent people in the whole surrounding area. During the third quarter of the 8th century BC the whole area can now be said to be abandoned. \nThis analysis confirmed the presence of a structured population in the area surrounding the future centre of Felsina, during the advanced Final Bronze Age. It also clearly emerges that the city and the other villages have coexisted for several generations, but for now it seems difficult to hypothesize the relationships between these contexts. On the other hand, it is clear that these villages share numerous common features, like a unitary project, similar building techniques and the same material culture. It seems probable that they had to be in close socio-economic relationships with each other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".