La carte santé à microprocesseur au Québec: simple clé dans le débat sur la protection des renseignements médicaux
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé: Le dépôt d' un avant-projet de loi sur l' introduction d 'une carte santé à microprocesseur au Québec à l' automne 2001 a réanimé un débat qui existait déjà depuis plusieurs années. Après avoir exposé le projet proposé , l'auteur analyse les principales critiques soulevées face à celui-ci lors des travaux en Commission parlementaire. Il propose par la suite une solution, inspirée par les des expérience étrangères en matière de protection des renseignements médicaux, pour mieux ancrer tout projet d'informatisation de ceux-ci et dont la carte santé ne serait que la clé .||Abstract:The deposit of a preliminary draft law concerning the introduction in Quebec of a health " smart card " in autumn 2001 resuscitated a debate which had existed already for several years. After exposing the suggested project, the author analyzes the main criticisms raised in Parliamentary Committee. He proposes thereafter a solution, inspired in part by foreign experience in medical data protection, to better establish any medical data project, of which the "smart card" would only be the key.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".