Lettres inedites du missionnaire J. Navieres sur le Canada, 1735-1737.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aii mois d'aout 1893, notre ami M. Louis Guibert, secretaire general de la Societe archeologique et historique du Limousin, nous fit tenir a Saint-Paul-d'Eyjeaux (Haute-Vienne), de la part de M. Adolphe Navieres du Treuil, deux lettres du missionnaire Joseph Navieres 3 , cure dc Sainte-Anne, pres Quebec (1734-1740).L'une, quoique fort maltraitee par le temps, est a quelques mots pres, complete.L'autre, plus etendue, n'a pas ete integrale- ment conservee : il en manque plusieurs feuillets.Nous avonscru devoir dormer la premiere dans son entier.A la seconde, nous emprunterons d'assez nombreux details.Deja, il y a treize ans, dans la Revue de Geographie (n°de fevrier 1882), nous avons mis en lumiere la personne de J. Navieres, a propos de son interessante relation de voyage au Canada (1734).Gette relation, annotee, sur notre demande, par un lettre canadien, d'origine et de langue franchises, M. Benjamin Suite, haut fonc- tionnaire du ministere de la guerre du Dominion, a Ottawa, a ete reproduite in extenso par la Revue canadienne de Montreal (tome sixieme, XXII e de la collection, n° de Janvier 1886).Nous renverrons done a la Revue de Geographie et a la Revue canadienne les lecteurs qui voudraient d'amples renseignements sur notre auteur.Les documents que nous communiquons aujourd'hui com- 1. Communication faite au Congrfes des societes savantes lc 29 mars 1894.2. Ne en 1708, mort a Saint-Paul d'Eyjeaux, dont il iHaitcuiv archipretre, en 1756.OHM*^"* A LETTRES I)E J. NAVIERES SUR LE CANADA.pletentceux que nous avons precedemmentpublies.En effet, quand noire missionnaire ecrivit sa grande relation, il venait a peine de s'installer dans son presbytere de Sainte-Anne, a sept lieues de Quebec.Ses vues sur Tensemble du Canada etaient raoins pre- cises; sa connaissance de la region restreinte ou il exercait son ministere etait encore superficielle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.070 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".