La norma internacional de Contabilidad 16, relativa a propiedades, planta y equipo, su interpretación y relación con la normativa tributaria-mercantil y su incidencia en la presentación de los estados financieros
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Esta investigación tiene por objetivo interpretar La Norma Internacional de Contabilidad número 16, relativa a Propiedad Planta y Equipo. Los tipos de estudio a utilizar en el diseño de la investigación son: El estudio, descripción y análisis; el primero facilitará obtener información que permita realizar un análisis preliminar, así como una definición del problema en estudio. Se concluye que la mayoría de profesionales al frente de la contabilidad posee poca experiencia en lo referente a la Aplicación de las Normas Internacionales de Contabilidad, ya que desconocen la mayor parte de los procedimientos y la base técnica contable aplicable a dichos procedimientos. Los planes de estudio de la carrera de contaduría pública, apenas abarca conceptos básicos de dicha normativa, dejando la responsabilidad a opciones de más elevado nivel. Obviamente, los estudios superiores están designados a profesionales que pueden costear la inversión o a empresas que, dentro de su presupuesto alcancen a capacitar a su staff de profesionales
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.020 | 0.057 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".