MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039091366

Le Droit à la Langue de l'Autre

2019· other· en· W7039091366 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGreenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)PretextGovernment (linguistics)Interpretation (philosophy)Filter (signal processing)Ridiculous
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In her essay titled ‘Thresholds: A Prosody of Citizenship’, Lisa Robertson posits language at the origin and as constitutive of all political subjects. The essay was originally published in Canada in 2012 as ‘Untitled Essay’ in Nilling, and its recent re-print in the UK by Book Woks and The Common Guild for the Dialecty series appears very timely indeed. In her essay Robertson talks of the vernacular as a shared language, learnt not from dictionaries and textbooks but from the subjects co-existence, she describes it as “something which loosely gathers whatever singular words and cadences move a given situation, a given meeting, as it is being lived by its speakers”, thus echoeing Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s work on language in La Prose du monde for instance. The vernacular, Robertson adds, may be characterized, by wit, excess, plasticity, … as well as polylinguality. Curiously Merleau-Ponty remains very evasive on the subject of multilingualism, with one remark in Phénoménologie de la perception explaining that one can only live in one language at a time because one cannot possibly inhabit two worlds simultaneously. 
\n
\nFor this paper I propose a close reading and analysis of Robertson’s essay, through the lens of the bilingual subject, and in particular, of the bilingual subject whose rights as a citizen have been, or might be, withdrawn. This is the situation many Europeans citizen living in the UK are currently facing. This is also something that Jacques Derrida experienced for a duration of three years, when his French citizenship was revoked because of newly implemented administrative rules between France and Algeria. Derrida talks about this in Le Monolinguisme de l’autre, and writes ‘Je n’ai qu’une langue et ce n’est pas la mienne’.
\nWhat I would like to explore in this paper and I think is at stake here is not necessarily the tension which might exist between vernacular language and institutionalised language, or langue, but between vernacular political language and institutionalised political rights and the movements that might occur between the two.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.540
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it