Kryžiaus kelio raiška Tytuvėnų bernardinų vienuolyno ansamblio sienų tapyboje: išsaugojimo būtinybė
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Stations of the Cross are the most outstanding mural paintings, which has been preserved in the quondam Bernardine monastery ensemble. The stations were created in the last quarter of the 18th century afer building the square churchyard with the arcades next to the church. The theme of contemplating the pain of Christ has been always an important part of decoration in the monastery and the church since the Bernadine settled there in the first half of the 17th century. The Stations of the Cross featured in the churchyard of Tytuvenai ensemble is a unique piece of sacral art of this kind that has remained in Lithuania. Regardless of its unique status, it keeps decaying with years. The current article uses both the historical and iconographic records to remind us of the necessity of preserving this valuable heritage object. Although the total 39-station ensemble consists of 14 hors-relief and 25 mural paintings, we are inclined to stress the paintings, most of which are under risk of decaying due to the plaster cracking from humidity and salts as well as the paint peeling off. Therefore, they need to be restored with immediate effect. The guide on Tytuvėnai ‘calvaries’ published in 1781 has served as a source of reconstructing the unique scenes of the Stations of the Cross, which are rare in the Lithuanian art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".