Los juegos tradicionales en la filatelia.: Estudio praxiológico y multicultural de la actividad lúdica.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thematic Philately shows in detail the evolution of humanity. Indeed, it has been reflected in this encyclopedia in miniature works of\nart, governments, inventions, uniforms, clothing, heraldry, flora, fauna, vegetation, etc. The sporting phenomenon has also been\npresent in the mail, as they have been immortalized World Cup, Olympics, Tour de France, featured high-level athletes, etc.\nIn order to delimit the study, we focused the investigation on the stamps issued in 2009 by the UPAEP (Postal Union of the Americas,\nSpain and Portugal) based on the motor praxiology. The organization is formed, for the following countries: Netherlands Antilles,\nArgentina, Aruba, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Chile, Ecuador, El Salvador, Spain, United States, Guatemala,\nHaiti, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Dominican Republic, Surinam, Uruguay and Venezuela.\nThe sources used for search data have almost always been primary. In this sense, we have reviewed different photographic media\ncatalogs, postcards, magazines, books on the practice games, etc, but mainly philatelic catalogs. Finally, we show data and results\nand we end with conclusions and future prospective for further investigations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".