MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039182593

Mapping coastal Great Lakes wetlands and adjacent land use through hybrid optical-infrared and radar image classification techniques

2013· article· en· W7039182593 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWetlandPhragmitesSynthetic aperture radarLand coverThematic MapperLand useBaseline (sea)Flood mythAncillary dataSensor fusion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the U.S., the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) is the most contiguous and current wetland map available, yet it lacks information on lands adjacent to wetlands and the distribution of invasive plants. Existing Canadian maps are comprised of a mosaic of mapping techniques, sources, and resolutions. A consistent baseline map is needed to monitor change in coastal ecosystems. Short falls in long-term monitoring is in part caused by reliance on dated, static, and inconsistent maps. Use of SOLEC or GLEI indicators is impeded by limitations of current maps, impacting the ability to monitor and detect effects from significant wetlands stressors; urban development and invasive plant species. Current work is underway to produce an international and contemporary baseline map for the Great Lakes Basin. Due to the complexity of wetland ecosystems, detection of species and extent as well as adjacent land use can be accomplished using sensor fusion approach. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is sensitive to flood condition as well as structure and biomass. Optical sensors, such as Landsat TM, are complementary in the classification and monitoring of wetland ecosystems. Previous research demonstrated the capability of ALOS PALSAR L-band data for detecting and mapping invasive Phragmites australis. The international wetlands map is being produced from a fusion of PALSAR and Landsat data and aims at detection of large stands of problematic plant species such Phragmites australis and Typha spp. A Random Forests classifier is used to create a land cover map through the integration of field and air photo interpreted data with underling sensor fusion data. The Lake Michigan map is complete and is being evaluated for accuracy through randomly selected field and air photo interpreted validation data. The basin wide maps will provide the first ever international Great Lakes coastal land cover map suitable for coastal wetland assessment and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it