MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039183414

Last-second goal lifts Lightning over Canadiens

2015· other· en· W7039183414 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVictoryPublicityLightning (connector)Tournament
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

>Final score came with 1.1 seconds left There are last second goals, and then there are ACTUAL last second goals. The winning goal in the Tampa Bay Lightning's 2-1 victory over the Montreal Canadiens fits into that second category. 1.1 seconds were left when Lightning center Tyler Johnson made the final shot.... CUT Those last second heroics put the Lightning on the verge of sweeping the Canadiens and moving onto the NHL Eastern Conference Finals. Canadiens winger Brendan Gallagher says even down 3 games to 0, with their backs against the wall, the Canadiens have to believe they can win this series. CUT Besides the final score, the Canadiens won most of the stat battles in Game 3--they had a 31-19 advantage in shots on goal, and won 52 percent of the faceoffs. Both teams will have to deal with a quick turnaround, as they'll play Game 4 tonight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1300.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)Same topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207