Les squatters de la rivière Gatineau entre 1812 et 1870
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au XIXe siècle, la région de l'Outaouais est en plein essor économique, principalement propulsé par le développement effréné de l'industrie forestière. En moins d'un demi-siècle, le confluent des rivières Gatineau et des Outaouais passe d'un endroit largement inhabité à l'une des plus importantes plaques tournantes du commerce du bois au Bas-Canada. En marge de l'exploitation forestière, un certain nombre de colons osent s'aventurer en Haute-Gatineau pour occuper les terres nouvellement accessibles. Ces squatters s'installent donc illégalement sur un territoire appartenant essentiellement à la Couronne. Lorsque les autorités décident finalement d'explorer les rives de la rivière Gatineau aux alentours de 1840, les arpenteurs rencontrent alors ces poches de population installées depuis plusieurs décennies. Peu de choses sont donc connues sur ces squatters, tant sur leurs origines que sur la nature des entretiens avec les autres groupes sociaux présents sur la rivière Gatineau à la même époque.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".