On Linking the Micro and Macro Analysis of Policies and Institutions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From Introduction: \n \n"This paper has three major objectives. First, it is to place on the agenda of 'Comparative Institutional Analysis', the issue of the interdependencies between constitutional arrrange-ments (on the one hand) and policy performance (on the other hand). Policy analysts have long been sensitive to the inter-dependencies between different policies Thus, education policies can be shown to be interdependent with employment policies and those with government fiscal policies and so on. Economists have pushed these analyses the furthest with their conceptual reasoning about technical and pecuniary externalities. There has also been increasing awareness of the interdependencies between institutional arrangements for organizing public policies. Thus, we are aware of the multi-organizational arrangements that characterize the provision and production of most policies and services to residents of the the world's cities."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it