Location and interrelations of the roma quarter of Harman Mahala with the urban structure of the city of Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to analyse the location and the spatial interrelations of the Roma-populated Harman Mahala quarter of the city of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. Three types of boundaries of the ghettoized urban structure (GUS) have been distinguished – "solid", "blurry" and "symbolic". The solid boundaries are outlined taking into account the urban space inhabited by the Roma ethnic community, i.e. from a "static" point of view. In defining the “blurry” boundaries of the GUS, the specifics of the residents’ spatial behaviour were analyzed. Movement in space is closely linked to the following “functional spaces”: labour, education, recreation and leisure, sports, commerce, healthcare, transport and commuting, with their inherent material and technical facilities, organizational structure and interactions.Through those interactions, the so-called “functional space” is outlined. The third aspect taken into consideration is the outlining of the so-called "symbolic space" of the GUS, the boundaries of which are dependent on how the local Roma population perceives the urban space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".