Les représentations du Sacré Cœur de Jésus : les petites images pieuses en «dentelles mécaniques» au Québec au XIXe et au début du XXe siècle : un outil visuellement et textuellement performant au service de la diffusion de la dévotion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent ouvrage s'intéresse à un champ d'études délaissé en histoire de l'art, celui du canivet dit de type « dentelles mécaniques ». Ce mémoire se concentrera sur l'imagerie pieuse de petit format concernant l'un des deux pôles dévotionnels majeurs du catholicisme du XIXe siècle, soit le Sacré Cœur de Jésus. Nous verrons que le canivet, sous l'apparence d'un objet à première vue anodin, quoiqu'aux usages multiples dans son contexte d'origine, est un élément participatif de la construction de l'identité catholique canadienne-française. Pour ce faire nous allons démontrer que le canivet mécanique est un outil visuel et textuel performant qui mise sur l'affect afin d'assurer la diffusion de la dévotion au Sacré Cœur de Jésus tout en faisant la promotion de l'institution ecclésiastique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".