70. Manifeste au peuple du Québec. Fédération des Unions industrielles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le mouvement syndical constitue l’une des principales forces d’opposition au gouvernement Duplessis qui le combat tout aussi vigoureusement. En 1955, la Fédération des Unions industrielles du Québec (FUIQ) — qui contribuera à la naissance de la Fédération des Travailleurs du Québec en 1957 — adopte un manifeste proposant un vaste programme de transformations politiques, économiques et sociales : reconnaissance et protection des droits de la personne, rapatriement et mise à jour de la constitution canadienne, développement de la sécurité sociale, meilleure gestion des ressources naturelles, nouveau code du travail équitable et efficace, réforme de l’éducation, assainissement des pratiques électorales et parlementaires. Ce manifeste a été en bonne partie inspiré et rédigé par Pierre Elliott Trudeau (qui en reprend plusieurs thèmes dans le manifeste du Rassemblement démocratique publié dans Le Devoir du 14 septembre 1956). Comme l’illustre le manifeste de la FUIQ, le mouvement syndical a été parmi les pourvoyeurs des idées qui orienteront la Révolution tranquille. Tout au long des années 1950, le débat s’enrichit sans cesse d’idées de sources diverses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.093 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".