MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039511084

Moneda a industria. La reforma de 1824 y la acuñación de moneda en Barcelona (1836-1848)

2004· article· es· W7039511084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) · 2004
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Order (exchange)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El artículo trata de la necesidad de incrementar la oferta monetaria en los comienzos de cualquier proceso de industrialización (en este caso el catalán) muy por encima del crecimiento de la renta. En España esto se vio enormemente dificultado debido a las inadecuaciones inherentes a la reforma monetaria de 1824. En el estudio se precisan estas inadecuaciones la paridad de cambio de la moneda española con el franco, la relación bimétalica y el nivel de tarifas- y se evidencia que ello implicó que entre 1824 y 1848, la acuñación de moneda en España fuera reducida en extremo, tanto en términos absolutos como relativos. En la segunda parte del trabajo se describe cómo se consiguió acuñar en Barcelona (entre 1836 y 1848) cantidades considerables de moneda de oro; y se muestra que ello constituyó una condición necesaria para proceder a la creación de un banco de emisión en Barcelona (en 1844), susceptible de generar una oferta de moneda fiduciaria que desvaneciera, definitivamente, el agobio de la deflación que había lastrado el despegue de la industrialización de la industrialización en Cataluña en sus inicios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya)Same topicHistorical and socio-economic studies of Spain and related regionsFrench-language works237,207