Les Actes de l'atelier : Transnationalisation des solidarités et mouvements des femmes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ces actes présentent les résultats de l’atelier "Transnationalisation des solidarités et mouvements des femmes" qui s’est tenu à l’Université de Montréal les 28-29 avril 2006. Le fil conducteur de cet atelier reposait sur trois questions: Comment conduire correctement des recherches sur les mouvements sociaux transnationaux? Quelle est la place des mouvements de femmes au plan transnational? À quoi ressemble le processus de transnationalisation des solidarités ? Notre première intuition était qu’il était probablement nécessaire de conduire des recherches collectives, ou au moins, nécessaire d’y réfléchir collectivement; ce que nous avons fait durant ces deux journées. Les principaux objectifs étaient de partager nos connaissances empiriques sur le processus de transnationalisation en essayant de le faire à travers une réflexion qui serait elle aussi transnationale, d’où la diversité d’origines géographiques et disciplinaires des intervenantes. La finalité de l’atelier était d’identifier de potentiels nouvelles pistes de recherches et/ou des projets de recherches communs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".