Mission pour preparer la position africaine sur les questions qui seront abordees a Rio de Janeiro, Johannesburg, 3-6 mars 1998
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent document s’agit de la dernière Assemblée générale de l'OACl, tenue en septembre 1995 à Montréal, le groupe africain a défendu une position commune africaine préparée par la CAFAC, la CEA, l'OUA et l'AFRAA, sur les systèmes de ou communications et de surveillance et la gestion du trafic aérien. Dans cette note, le groupe africain a de demande à la communauté internationale, d'organiser une conférence mondiale sur le financement des systèmes CNS/ATM. Cette demande a été acceptée et l'QACI a été chargée d'organiser ladite conférence. Le gouvernement du Brésil a accepté d'abriter la conférence du 11 au 15 mai 1998 à Rio de Janeiro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it