MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039710025

[MSG-TV] Jazz vs Knicks: Live Stream (NBA Basketball Online 2019)

2019· other· en· W7039710025 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJazzVictoryShot (pellet)Quarter (Canadian coin)Time lineBasketball
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Utah Jazz have been on a nice run lately as they’ve won nine of their last 13 games and they will be aiming for a fifth straight victory after blowing past the Wizards in a 116-95 road win on Monday. =========================== Watch Live NOW >> https://247itv.info/nba-allaccess Watch Live NOW >> https://247itv.info/nba-allaccess =========================== Donovan Mitchell led the team in scoring with 19 points, Jae Crowder added 18 points off the bench, Joe Ingles scored 16 points while Rudy Gobert chipped in with 14 points and 14 rebounds. As a team, the Jazz shot 53 percent from the field and 14 of 37 from the 3-point line as they set the tone with their defense in the first half before putting the game out of reach in the third quarter where they poured in 34 points. With the win, Utah improved to 41-29 on the season and 18-17 on the road which is good for seventh place in the Western Conference standings. Meanwhile, the New York Knicks have been in a serious slump as they’ve lost nine of their last 10 games and they will be hoping to bounce back after getting routed by the Raptors in a 128-92 road loss on Monday. Allonzo Trier led the team with 22 points off the bench, Kevin Knox added 12 points while Damyean Dotson chipped in with just 11 points but no other player finished in double figures. As a team, the Knicks shot a miserable 32 percent from the field and eight of 36 from the 3-point line as they never looked threatening after falling behind by 19 points going into halftime. With the loss, New York fell to 14-57 on the season and 7-31 on the road. Looking at the betting trends, the Jazz are 6-1 ATS in their last seven road games, 8-2 ATS in their last 10 games against a team with a losing record and 4-0 ATS in their last four games overall. The Knicks are 6-1 ATS in their last seven games following a loss of more than 10 points, 6-17 ATS in their last 23 home games and 2-5 ATS in their last seven games overall. Head to head, the over is 6-0 in the last six meetings, the Jazz are 2-11 ATS in the last 13 meetings in New York and the Jazz are 4-23 ATS in the last 27 meetings overall. The Knicks are just in a shambles right now as they can’t buy a win and are coming into this one fresh off a 36-point loss. The Jazz have been on an absolute tear lately as they’ve won four straight games by double-digits, so it’s hard to see anything but a similar result here, but the betting trends don’t favor the Jazz who are 4-23 ATS in the last 27 meetings overall. This is a lot of points for any road team, but I think the Jazz stay red-hot with an easy win and cover here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.9590.974

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)Same topicEnvironmental and Biological Research in Conflict ZonesFrench-language works237,207