From the Northwest Passage to the Canadian Inland Waters : political history of the Canadian Arctic Waters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the Northwest Passage to the Canadian Inland Waters: Political History of the Canadian Arctic Waters, "Ad Americam", vol. 9, pp. 49-59. The North is one of the most important Canadian myths. Northern geography and concern for the North are treated by Canadians as distinct features, symbols of their country and an important part of their national identity. The theme of my presentation is a change in the official name of the Canadian northern sea route through the Arctic Archipelago, which connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and is the shortest way from the east to west coasts of North America. For centuries the passage has been referred to as the Northwest Passage and has become part of a northern myth. However, in 2006 the Canadian Army decided to change the official name to the Canadian Inland Waters. The alteration was politically motivated and has its roots in a controversy over the legal status of the channels and straits of the Northwest Passage, which started at the end of the 1960s. At the beginning of the 21st century, the debate resurfaced once again because of the effects of global warming. The northern mythology once again is becoming visible.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.036 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".