MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7039774071

Numerical Modelling of Exposed Base Plate Connections and Their Influence on System-level Seismic Response

2021· dissertation· en· W7039774071 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueQSpace (Queen's University Library) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEducation Practices and Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpenSeesBase (topology)Nonlinear systemInduced seismicityStiffnessFinite element methodFlexural strengthRoofColumn (typography)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gravity columns with exposed base plate connections are often assumed as pinned in both analysis and design. However, past experiments have shown that base plate connections can provide a significant level of flexural strength and stiffness. This study investigates the influence that the effect of base plate flexural strength and stiffness have on the global seismic response of steel structures. To capture the nonlinear response of exposed base plate connections, a detailed and simplified approaches to model exposed base plate connections are developed. To validate the proposed modelling approach in ABAQUS and OpenSees, it is compared with available experimental data in the literature. The results show that both developed modelling approaches can capture the nonlinear cyclic response of exposed column base connections and that the simplified model is suitable for conducting nonlinear time-history analysis. 
\nTo investigate the influence of column base fixity on the system-level response of steel structures, the nonlinear dynamic response of a set of prototype single-story steel concentrically braced frames with flexible roof diaphragms was studied. The buildings are designed for a site in Vancouver, British Columbia and considered structures in regions with different hazard levels, soil classes and building dimensions to provide insight into the influence that the level of seismic demand and building geometry has on their response. Finite element models of each prototype structure were developed in OpenSees and were subjected to a series of ground motion records representative of the regional seismicity in Western Canada. Each prototype structure is subjected to the series of earthquakes with three different assumptions for the degree of base fixity: (1) pinned, (2) fixed, and (3) a realistic base plate connection. The results of the study show that the degree of column base fixity does not have a significant influence on the system-level response of the prototype structures, including maximum drift, residual drift, and maximum ductility demand on the bracing. These results suggest that a pinned base connection is a suitable assumption for single-storey steel braced frame structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQSpace (Queen's University Library)Same topicEducation Practices and ChallengesFrench-language works237,207