MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7039865970

Natural history of common gartersnakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) in east-central British Columbia

2018· dissertation· en· W7039865970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatRange (aeronautics)Hibernation (computing)OccupancyHome rangeWildlifePopulationWildlife management
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Widely distributed species typically exhibit variation in various aspects of their ecology throughout their range. Such variation offers opportunities for fundamental studies in evolution, including local adaptation, biogeographic rules, distributional limits, and speciation. Geographic variation also limits our ability to extrapolate from one population to another, making site-specific knowledge of ecology essential for wildlife management and conservation. I studied the natural history of Common Gartersnakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) at two sites in east-central British Columbia, where active seasons are short and cool. I used opportunistic sampling of snakes to study general features of their ecology and radiotelemetry to study movements and habitat selection, including hibernating sites. In September, snakes move from summer habitats to hibernating sites and then emerge from hibernation in April or May. Adult female T. sirtalis overwintered with 0 to 16 other adults in inconspicuous underground hollows, typically in forested habitats, near water and/or coarse woody debris; this is distinct from the large-scale communal hibernation seen in other northern populations. Hibernacula were typically distant from summer habitat (mean = 1485 ± 937 m SD, n = 8, range = 148-2657 m). Under the assumption that snakes exhibit site fidelity to hibernacula in consecutive years, I estimated the cumulative distance moved over the entire active season to be 7011 ± 3756 m SD (n = 9, range = 3510-15015 m). Gravid female snakes moved at significantly lower rates, followed more tortuous paths, and inhabited areas that were more open-canopied than their nongravid counterparts (n = 13). Nongravid snakes used locations with a higher percentage of ground cover than gravid snakes. Mating occurred in early spring near the hibernacula and parturition in early to mid August in summer habitat; litter size ranged from 3 to 25 and was not significantly correlated with the size of the female. Adult snakes preyed exclusively on adult Western Toads (Anaxyrus boreas) and juvenile snakes fed on leeches and metamorphosing toads. Through the identification of migratory routes, relevant summer and winter habitat characteristics, and hibernation sites, my study contributes to the protection and conservation of northern reptiles, which are particularly vulnerable to population declines compared to southern populations due to the restrictive cold climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→