Bibliographic record
Abstract
The essay moves from the different versions of the fragment known as De vera laetitia.It translates a fundamental aspect of the experience of Francis of Assisi and contains in itself many of the elements of the successive transformations of the image of the man of Assisi.The Fioretti di san Francesco translate and transform De vera laetitia; Paul Sabatier's Vie de saint François (1893) is a translation of a series of translations.In the second part of the essay, the differences and links between the first edition of the Vie, the so-called édition de guerre (1918), the first Italian translation of the work (1896) and the posthumous edition (1931; Sabatier died in 1928) will be analysed.The early fluctuations between saint Francis and the virile hero and the translation of his virtues into heroism will be highlighted.The édition de guerre transformed these oscillations into a sequence of translated biblical quotations, placed at the beginning of each chapter.Sabatier's religious interpretation of the war fed on these free translations, in the conviction that the prescription always emerged from the quotation (and its translation).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".