Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pourquoi un si grand nombre de Canadiens ne se sentent pas chez eux dans leur propre pays ? Certains de nos principaux problèmes et controverses politiques ne pourraient-ils pas trouver leur résolution dans une nouvelle forme de dialogue ? Ce sont les questions que développe ici le philosophe politique Charles Blattberg, qui affirme que la voie que nous devrions privilégier aujourd'hui en politique canadienne est la conversation. Selon lui, toutes les formes de dialogue auxquelles nous avons eu recours jusqu'à présent sont inadéquates et seule la conversation permettra des rapprochements réels en cas de conflit et pourra mener à une pleine réalisation du bien commun. Dans cet essai étonnant, Blattberg défend une nouvelle conception de ce qu'est ou devrait être un pays : une communauté de citoyens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.722 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".