Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edward Towpik, MD, to act as the Editor-in-Chief of the Nowotwory journal.After almost a quarter of a century of excellent work for the journal and the Polish oncological community, in April 2018, Professor Edward Towpik decided to resign from this position.It is worth recalling -necessarily in a nutshellhow much he has managed to achieve during this period.Soon after the election of the new Editor-in-Chief in Nowotwory principles of preparing the papers for printing recommended by the Committee of Medical Journal Editors (the so-called Vancouver style) were introduced.The text of these "principles", translated by the Editorial Team, was for the first time published in Polish in our journal.Due to the systematic growth in the number of incoming articles in 1998, the journal became a bimonthly.A year later, the format was changed and the layout modernised in accordance with global standards.Two layers later, Professor Towpik significantly changed the role and composition of the Editorial Board, inviting a group of foreign experts to participate and creating the International Editorial Board.Moreover, the journal started publishing articles in English (in electronic form) and the title of the journal was changed (Nowotwory Journal of Oncology).At that time, the Editor also decided to create the position of Co-Editor (since 2001, Dr Richard F. Mould from the UK, and since 2014 -the undersigned).The journal managed by Professor Edward Towpik has regularly published supplements on the history of Polish oncology (e.g. the first Polish edition of Wilhelm Konrad Roentgen's work On a new kind of rays from 1896), texts of habilitation (DSc) dissertations, collections of lectures and summaries from oncological congresses of scientific societies, including, first of all, the four Polish Congresses in Oncology that have been held so far.Professor Edward Towpik as the Editor-in-Chief of Nowotwory journal initiated and developed numerous excellent monographs, such as To bear testimony to the truth (Da wiadectwo prawdzie) by Professor Tadeusz Koszarowski, describing more than twenty years of effort, in the struggle leading to the Centre for Oncology being created at the Ursynw site, Warsaw.At the turn of the first and second decade of the 21st century, the Editor-in-Chief, in close cooperation with then Board of the Polish Society of Oncology, decided to deeply professionalise the publishing process of the magazine, entrusting the issues of typesetting and printing to ViaMedica.At that time the journal received a new graphical design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.580 | 0.574 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".