MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7040925241

[no title]

2024· other· fr· W7040925241 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDirectory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation) · 2024
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Innovation and Language Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCultural institutionHistorical heritagePosition (finance)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans les années précédant la Première Guerre mondiale, les arts de la scène connaissent un essor étonnant à Montréal. Visible dans les journaux, un éveil culturel sans précédent prend la forme d’articles en tous genres qui mènent à la naissance de la critique théâtrale professionnelle au Canada français. Objet de suspicion, le théâtre ne manque pas de provoquer dans les journaux des prises de position singulières et d’âpres discussions quant aux modèles à suivre et à la voie à prendre pour faire de Montréal une métropole culturelle digne de ce nom. Les discours sur le théâtre qui peuplent la presse hebdomadaire permettent de saisir cet élan et de découvrir les journalistes qui l’ont soutenu. À travers eux, c’est un pan méconnu de l’histoire culturelle montréalaise qui s’offre au lecteur.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0090.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5290.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDirectory of Open access Books (OAPEN Foundation)Same topicEducation, Innovation and Language StudiesFrench-language works237,207