MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7040978847

Mary Prettyman

2022· article· en· W7040978847 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClosing (real estate)AviationBachelorCivil aviationCommercial aviationChinaAircraft industryAir transport
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mary Prettyman leads the global marketing team for Pratt & Whitney’s commercial engines division, promoting the company’s products and services, and developing market analysis to support the company’s strategic vision for a sustainable aviation future. In her prior role, she managed sales regions, including the West Asia and Oceania with large fleets in India, New Zealand and Australia, and the Americas, closing key customer business with Air Canada and Delta Air Lines among others. Prior to joining Pratt & Whitney in 2015, she enjoyed a 20-year career with Airbus in various leadership roles in sales and marketing, involving transactions for hundreds of Airbus commercial aircraft sold to airline customers in the US and Canada. Ms. Prettyman spent several years prior in marketing at regional aircraft manufacturer Fokker Aircraft USA. She began her career in Long Beach, CA as an Aerodynamics Engineer at Douglas Aircraft Company. Ms. Prettyman holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Aeronautics and Astronautics from MIT and a Master of Science degree in Civil Engineering – Transportation Studies from the University of California at Berkeley. Ms. Prettyman serves on the Board of Directors as Vice President and President-elect for ISTAT, the International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading. She volunteers as a mentor for ISTAT University students beginning their aviation careers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.920
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University)Same topicAviation Industry Analysis and TrendsFrench-language works237,207