Bibliographic record
Abstract
From 6 October 2013 to 18 May 2014, the International Centre of Lace and Fashion in Calais showcased contemporary textiles through the exhibition Lace Effects 1. This is one of the actions of the European Crysalis project, which was selected as part of the European cross-border cooperation programme INTERREG IVa 2 Seas, co-funded by the ERDF. Grouped together under the title Moving Textiles, the Crysalis exhibition series links both the notions of expertise and technical proficiency to textile innovation. Lace Effects 1 thus presents textile, fashion and design works inspired by the lace theme. \n \nI showed a piece of work inspired by the Lace Collection at the International Centre of Lace and Fashion. I have also been granted permission by the Art Gallery of Ontario to use the photograph 'Lodz ghetto 1941-1944' taken by Henryk Ross for this work. \n \nThe museum has a working lace loom demonstrating the traditional industrial lace making skills. The machinery is lubricated with graphite, not oil; when the full factory was running there must have been a large amount of graphite dust in the air at all times. I played around with the idea of this graphite dust settling onto discarded clothing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.342 | 0.079 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".