O “BLANDENGUE” ARTIGAS E O REGRAMENTO DA FRONTEIRA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMOEste trabalho objetiva discutir as experiências de regramento da fronteira de Montevidéu com o território luso através da atuação de José Artigas enquanto oficial do “Cuerpo de Blandengues”. Este corpo militar foi uma polícia rural criada pela Coroa espanhola com o objetivo de fiscalizar o contrabando e frear os excessos cometidos por seus agentes. Tais desdobramentos se desenvolveram no bojo das políticas reformistas ibéricas elaboradas para solucionar os problemas relativos aos campos entre o Rio Grande e o Rio da Prata, no último quartel do século XVIII e começos do século XIX. Entre o escopo destas disposições, é possível evidenciar tentativas de melhoramento do aparato fiscal e afirmação das fronteiras, mediante propostas de racionalização da esfera produtiva agropecuária, a consolidação da propriedade individual, introdução de novas técnicas, reordenamento do trabalho e, portanto, o regramento dos trabalhadores.ABSTRACTThis paper aims to discuss the experiences of the Montevideo boarder regulation with the Portuguese territory through the actions of José Artigas as an officer of the “Corps de Blandengues”. This military corps was a rural police created by the Spanish Crown aiming at controling the contraband and curbing the excesses committed by its agents. These developments have evolved in the wake of the Iberian reformist policies designed to resolve the problems relating to the fields between the Rio Grande and the Rio de La Plata, in the last quarter of the 18th century and early 19th. Among the scope of these provisions, it is possible to show attempts to improve the fiscal apparatus and assurance of borders with proposals of rationalization of the agricultural productive sphere, consolidation of individual property, introduction of new techniques, work reorganization and, therefore, regulations for workers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".