MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042107610

Observation of a Narrow Resonance in the D/S+ Pi^0 System at 2.32-GeV/C^2 with BABAR

2018· other· en· W7042107610 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2018
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCrystallography and Radiation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesInstitute of High Energy PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungAlfred P. Sloan FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsResonance (particle physics)Feature (linguistics)Field (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new state with invariant mass near 2.32 GeV/c 2 has been observed by the BABAR Collaboration in the inclusive D + s π 0 mass distribution using 91 fb -1 of e + e -annihilation data taken at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy storage ring at energies near 10.6 GeV.The new state is narrow, with an observed width that is consistent with the experimental resolution.This narrow width combined with the quantum numbers of the final state imply that the decay is isospin-violating.The state has natural spin-parity, and its low mass suggests a J P = 0 + assignment.s 1 , the D * s (2112) + , the D s1 (2536) + , and the D s2 (2573) + [4].Two predicted but as yet unobserved states are expected to have masses in the 2.4-2.6 GeV/c 2 range.Expected to decay to D ( * ) K, these states should be very broad, with widths on the order of a few hundred MeV, making them difficult to observe.However, if their masses should be below D ( * ) K threshold, they could be much narrower.A new state, shown in Figure 1, decaying to D + s π 0 with mass near 2317 MeV/c 2 and experimental width Γ ≈ 10 MeV, was first noted by Antimo Palano, of the BABAR Collaboration, in early 2003 [5]. THE DATA SET, EVENT SELECTION, AND ANALYSISThe BABAR detector is a general purpose, solenoidal, magnetic spectrometer, and is described in detail elsewhere [6].A data set of 91.5 fb -1 of e + e -data taken near 1 Charge-conjugate states are implied throughout.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicCrystallography and Radiation PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207