MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7042169631

And Still We Laugh

2017· article· en· W7042169631 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleofectionTSG101HyporeflexiaGestational periodPretextLiquationDiafiltration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I propose to read a selection of work from And Still We Laugh, a novel-in-short-stories told by Darryll 'Squito Bob, a halfbreed Nłeʔkepmx boy from a re-imagined small town in British Columbia's Fraser Canyon. The stories take place in the late-60s–early-70s, a tumultuous time in Canadian history. They draw from my experience as a mixed-blood Nłeʔkepmx, and member of the Lytton First Nation, as well as my experiences as a child and youth worker and foster parent, crisis line volunteer, and general observer of my world. Six of these stories have won or been shortlisted for prizes: "One Day at Recess," "Doug Bromley Must Die," "How Mosquito Got His Name," "T.H.E. King," "Salmon Song," and "Mavis Brown," which was also nominated for the Journey Prize and a Western Magazine Award. Six additional stories and a novella will round out the collection. Most of the stories in this project look at moments in other people's lives from 'Squito's perspective, exploring love, sex, child abuse, racism, rape and murder in a small, largely Nłeʔkepmx town. 'Squito has a unique view of his world, and his character shines through as he tells these stories. One of his strengths is his ability to make readers feel (somewhat) at ease, regardless of a scene's horror.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.186
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.004
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1860.171

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)→Same topicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights→French-language works237,207→