MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042249772

Optimisation de boîtes noires multifidélités avec contraintes hiérarchisées

2023· other· fr· W7042249772 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2023
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicIoT-based Smart Home Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsLongest common subsequence problemNonlinear modelStatistical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ: On propose un algorithme d’optimisation de boîtes noires multifidélités qui s’intéresse au cas où une grande proportion du temps d’optimisation utilisé par les algorithmes de recherche directe est dépensé sur des points non réalisables. La méthode proposée doit être couplée avec un solveur existant, et elle permet à celui-ci de réduire le temps espéré des évaluations en estimant, à l’aide d’évaluations peu coûteuses, si un point est réalisable avant d’y investir plus de temps. Ces estimations sont obtenues avec une hiérarchisation des contraintes affectées par la multifidélité, qui est définie par une matrice de biadjacance. On propose une méthode de calcul de cette matrice. La recherche présentée s’inscrit dans le projet Alliance du Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en génie du Canada (CRSNG) auquel participent Polytechnique Montréal et Hydro-Québec. À l’IREQ, un projet de recherche de stratégie de maintenance optimale requiert l’optimisation d’une boîte noire particulièrement coûteuse en temps qui contient plusieurs contraintes rarement satisfaites. L’algorithme est développé avec l’intention d’être appliqué à ce problème lorsque le projet d’Hydro-Québec atteindra cette phase. Dans le cadre de ce projet, des tests numériques sont effectués avec la famille de boîtes noires solar. Le solveur Optimisation non linéaire par recherche directe sur treillis adaptatifs : Nonlinear Optimisation by Mesh Adaptive Direct search (NOMAD) couplé à l’algorithme de hiérarchisation des contraintes est comparé au solveur NOMAD avec ses paramètres par défaut. Ces tests révèlent que l’algorithme permet de trouver des solutions significativement meilleures lorsqu’un point de départ réalisable est connu avant l’optimisation. Sans cette condition, les résultats sont variables; ils dépendent grandement des propriétés de la boîte noire optimisée. ABSTRACT: We propose a multi-fidelity blackbox optimization algorithm that addresses the problem of having to spend large computational resources on infeasible points when using direct search algorithms. The proposed method is coupled with an existing solver, allowing a decrease of the expected time per evaluation while keeping the efficiency and convergence properties of the existing method. This is achieved by estimating the feasibility of points to evaluate with low fidelity, hence low cost, evaluations before deciding if a point is worth the full time investment. These estimations are given by a hierarchy of constraints that are affected by the multi-fidelity, which is defined by a biadjacency matrix. We propose a computation method for this matrix. The project is part of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Alliance program. At Hydro-Quebec’s research institute : Institut de recherche en électricité du Québe (IREQ), an optimal maintenance strategy problem requires the optimization of a particularly costly blackbox, containing many rarely satisfied constraints. The proposed algorithm is developed with the intention of being applied to the optimal maintenance strategy problem when the project reaches the optimization stage. During this project, numerical tests are conducted on the solar family of blackbox problems. The Nonlinear Optimisation by Mesh Adaptive Direct search (NOMAD) software is used as the existing solver, and the solver with default parameters is compared to the solver coupled with the proposed algorithm during the tests. These tests show that given the same time budget, the coupling with the proposed method results in a great improvement in the quality of the solutions when a feasible starting point is known prior to the optimization. Without this condition, the results are mixed and largely depend on some properties of the optimized blackbox.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Same topicIoT-based Smart Home SystemsFrench-language works237,207