MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7042365510

Ovid's house of sleep (MET. 11.573-673)

2015· dissertation· en· W7042365510 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2015
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsPoetryNarrativeSleep (system call)Reading (process)VitalityInterpretation (philosophy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The house of Sleep is a remarkable episode in book eleven of Ovid’s Metamorphoses that combines the themes of imagination, poetry, and performance (among others). It appears as an inset episode within the larger narrative of the transformation of Ceyx and Alcyone into halcyon birds. And, in constellation with other episodes of the poem that touch on sleep, dreams, the underworld, and poetry, it offers insight into Ovid’s craft and the interpretation of his text. In this thesis, I explore different aspects of the house of Sleep in order to show its significance for reading Ovid’s poetry. Ultimately, I argue that Ovid offers the figure of Morpheus as a way of interpreting his poem as a live performance. The consequence of this is the kind of poetic vitality that is at the core of ancient texts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207