Pemilihan Jenis Batuan Oleh Masyarakat Prasejarah Di Kawasan Impak Meteorit Bukit Bunuh, Lenggong, Perak Dan Sumbangannya Kepada Teknologi Paleolitik
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bukit Bunuh is one of the Palaeolithic sites in meteorite impact area, located in \n Lenggong Valley which is 10 kilometers away from the city of Lenggong in the Hulu \n Perak district. This study was conducted to determine the raw materials and technology \n used by Palaeolithic societies in Bukit Bunuh thereby to testify the impact of meteorite \n in the area. Impact of a meteorite on Bukit Bunuh has been proved based on the world \n meteorite impact criteria listed in the table of The Planetary and Space Science Centre \n (PASSC), University of Brunswick, Canada. The table list of the six criteria such (i) \n macrostructure shatter cone, (ii) impact microstructure -PDF, (iii) coesite and stishovite \n minerals, (iv) impact crater, (v)impact melt, and (vi) suevite and including two more \n evidences such as specific gravity and existed of remnant meteorite (metals). Proof of a \n meteorite impact in Bukit Bunuh was based on the comparative studies, mapping, field \n analysis and scientific studies in the laboratory such as petrographic studies, XRF, XRD, \n SEM, stereomicroscope and specific gravity. Comparison of raw materials was carried \n on Southeast Asian Palaeolithic sited as well as their relationships with meteorite impact \n sites of the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".