PENGARUH DISIPLIN KERJA, LINGKUNGAN KERJA DAN PRODUKTIVITAS TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA BENGKEL ROFI MOTOR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
mengetahui dan menganalisis pengaruh disiplin kerja, lingkungan kerja dan \nproduktivitas terhadap kinerja karyawan Bengkel Rofi Motor. \nPenelitian yang telah digunakan di dalam penelitian ini yaitu kuantitatif. \nPopulasi yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah karyawan Bengkel Rofi \nMotor. Data yang digunakan yaitu data primer. Pengambilan sampel yang telah \ndigunakan di dalam penelitian ini dengan sampling jenuh. Pengumpulan data \ndigunakan dengan penyebaran kuesioner dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 40 \nresponden. \nAnalisis yang digunakan di dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik analisis \nregresi linear berganda, dengan menggunakan alat bantu SPSS (Statistical Product \nand Service Solution) versi 23.0. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa disiplin kerja \nberpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan, lingkungan kerja \nberpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan, dan produktivitas \nberpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja karyawan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it