Out in the Cold: <i>Schreyer v Schreyer</i>’s Call for Law Reform
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
the Supreme Court of Canada dealt with "a perceived clash between family law and bankruptcy law." 2 This case illustrates a problem that many spouses have encountered when attempting to obtain marital property settlements in the face of their spouse's bankruptcy, particularly in provinces with equalization regimes.In its decision, the Supreme Court outlined the problem, suggested that its hands were tied, and issued a clarion call for law reform in the face of its apparent inability to redress unfairness in outcomes.Schreyer also highlights the fact that some marital property regimes in Canadian provinces fail to actually give a proprietary remedy to a spouse at the time of separation or divorce, instead creating a debt relationship between spouses.Serious consequences can arise for the creditor spouse, usually a woman, when a debtor spouse declares bankruptcy.This comment outlines the facts in Schreyer, looks briefly at the sometimes competing objectives of the *
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it