Photons & Phonons: A room-temperature diamond quantum memory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis presents demonstrations of the storage and manipulation of single photons in \na room-temperature diamond quantum memory using a Raman memory protocol. We \nreport on results from four experiments. \n \nIn the first we demonstrate single photon storage and, upon retrieval, verify the quantum \nnature of the light with a Hanbury Brown Twiss measurement of g^(2)(0) = 0.65±0.07. \nA measurement of g^(2)(0) < 1 is indicative of quantum light. This is the first demonstration \nof single photon storage where the bandwidth of the stored light is greater than 1 THz. The \ndiamond memory stores light for over 13 times the duration of the input wavepacket. In \nthe second experiment, we report the storage and retrieval of polarization-encoded qubits \nand demonstrate qubit storage above a classical bound. We also verify that entanglement \nbetween the input photon and an auxiliary persists through storage and retrieval. \nWe then turn to additional uses of a Raman quantum memory. We demonstrate that \na photon stored in the diamond memory can, upon retrieval, have its frequency and bandwidth \nconverted. We report frequency conversion over a range of 4.2 times the bandwidth of \nthe input photon (4.1 nm, 2.3 THz), and bandwidth modulation between 0.5 to 1.9 times \nthe bandwidth of the input. We verify that the output light from storage and spectral \nmanipulation is still non-classical in nature. \n \nFinally, we demonstrate both single- and two-photon quantum interference mediated \nby the diamond memory, where the memory acts as a beamsplitter between photon and \noptical phonon modes in the diamond lattice. In a first experiment, a single photon is split \ninto two time-bins. The first time-bin is stored in the memory, then recalled and made to \ninterfere with the second time-bin producing fringes. In a second experiment, a photon \nfrom a weak coherent state is stored in the memory and, upon retrieval, undergoes Hong- \nOu-Mandel interference with a second photon. We measure Hong-Ou-Mandel interference \nwith a visibility of 59% giving a signature of non-classical interference (> 50%). \nThis collection of experiments establishes the diamond memory as a prime candidate for \ncertain quantum communication and processing applications. These results demonstrate \nthe potential for the diamond memory to be an integrated platform for photon storage, \nspectral conversion, and information processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".