Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1) Post card to P.H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, stamped Canadian Pacific Railway, 30 April 1895, Woodstock, Ont. The signature is unclear. The note states “…you don’t oftener think of me than I do of you & I’m bound to come & see you soon as I can—I expect to leave here 5:18 p.m. May 6 by G.T.R., have written James…” (2) Post card to James J. Bradt, Beamsville, Ont., from T. Balis, dated at Smithville, 4 July 1895. The note states “…Father died today. Funeral Saturday at 2 p.m. Please send word to Peter.” (3) Post card to Peter Bradt, Pelham Union, dated at Beamsville, 6 November 1895. The signature on the card is not clear. The note comments on the cost of hay. (4) Post card to Peter H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union from P.H. Cline (Clive?), dated at Jordan Station, 3 February 1896. The note states “…Everything is all right down here. The hay is all sold…” (5) Post card to P.H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from P.H. Cline (Clive?), dated 19 August 1896. The note states “…the thrashers will be here the 21…if you came they will be here in the morning…” (6) Post card to P.H.L. Bradt, Pelham Union, from P.H. Cline (Clive?), dated at Jordan Station, 9 September 1896. The note states “…will you kindly come down on Friday the 11 and see about cleaning seed wheat if you have time…”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.908 | 0.824 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".