Plasticizer Identification and Characterization Across Multiple Poly(Vinyl) Chloride (PVC) Blends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Poly(vinyl) Chloride (PVC) is extensively utilized as a thermoplastic due to its exceptional properties and diverse applications. However, PVC presents various recycling challenges compared to other polymer plastics. The characteristic halogen group (chlorine) is released as HCl during vigorous recycling processes, which deters researchers and recyclers. Formulations of PVC consist of multiple additives, such as plasticizers, which provide the material with flexibility but complicate recycling. Industrial plasticizers are typically phthalate-based, which are toxic and migrate from the material over time. In our research, we developed a methodology for the removal, identification, and quantification of a known phthalate di-isononyl phthalate (DINP)) and PVC blend. The extraction process, comprised of a solvent/anti-solvent system (THF: MeOH), coupled with multiple analytical methods, effectively removes multiple plasticizers from PVC blends. The process produces two products: the plasticizers in solution and the recycled PVC (rPVC) resin. Our findings indicated that the plasticizers were successfully removed and were below the limit of detection (LOD) with Fourier Transform Infrared - Attenuated Total Reflectance (FTIR-ATR) and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) analysis. Through NMR analysis, we identified multiple plasticizers utilized in the sample rPVC blends, highlighting the importance of understanding the composition of our blend. All rPVC blends contained the toxic phthalate plasticizer, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), with one blend relying on it as the sole plasticizer. DEHP is known for its strong plasticizing properties, which explains the flexibility of this blend. Another blend used in extrusion applications contained di-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate (DEHT) (primary plasticizer), tri-octyl trimellitate (TOTM), and DEHP. A custom blend produced by the recycler, made from 50% industrial and 50% post-consumer reprocessed PVC, contained a dual-plasticizer system of DEHT and DEHP. These results emphasize the need to identify and quantify phthalates in applications in PVC to control quality and mitigate the environmental and health impacts of toxic plasticizers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".